Independent comparison Updated April 2026 20 GPU providers tested Real hourly pricing

GPU cloud comparison · 2026

Hetzner GPU vs Jarvis Labs

J

Hetzner GPU wins on 3 of 5 key metrics — but the right choice depends on your workload.

Overall Winner
Hetzner GPU
Affordable EU GPU servers — A100 at European prices
from €0.35/h
★★★★☆ 4.2 / 5 (834 reviews)
Try Hetzner GPU →
VS
J
Jarvis Labs
On-demand H100 / A100 / RTX 6000 Ada from $0.39/h
from $0.39/h
★★★★☆ 4.3 / 5 (312 reviews)
Try Jarvis Labs →

Head-to-Head Comparison

Hetzner GPU
J Jarvis Labs
Starting Price Lower hourly rate
from €0.35/h
from $0.39/h
Overall Rating User rating
4.2 / 5
4.3 / 5
GPU Types Variety
2 types
4 types
Max VRAM Largest available
80 GB
80 GB
Locations Regions covered
DE, FI
US, Asia
Wins out of 5
3
2

GPU Availability

Hetzner GPU
A100 PCIeGTX 1080

VRAM: 8–80 GB · Locations: DE, FI

J Jarvis Labs
RTX 6000 AdaA100 40GBA100 80GBH100

VRAM: 48–80 GB · Locations: US, Asia

Pros & Cons

Hetzner GPU
Pros
  • Best GPU pricing in Europe
  • GDPR and EU data residency compliant
  • Excellent API and automation support
  • Trusted Hetzner infrastructure
Cons
  • Limited GPU types — mainly A100
  • No H100 availability yet
  • Fewer GPU locations than US providers
J Jarvis Labs
Pros
  • Excellent pricing for H100
  • RTX 6000 Ada — 48GB at moderate cost
  • Polished UI for non-DevOps users
  • Quick spinup, low friction
Cons
  • Smaller GPU variety than RunPod
  • No serverless / autoscaling
  • Limited European presence

Which Should You Choose?

Choose Hetzner GPU if…
  • You need GPU compute for EU compliance
  • You need GPU compute for Research
  • You need GPU compute for Inference APIs
  • You need GPU compute for Budget EU GPU
  • Lower price is your top priority (from €0.35/h vs from $0.39/h)
J Choose Jarvis Labs if…
  • You need GPU compute for Researchers and indie developers
  • You need GPU compute for Llama fine-tuning
  • You need GPU compute for Stable Diffusion training
  • You need GPU compute for Jupyter notebook users
  • Higher user satisfaction matters (4.3 vs 4.2)
  • You want more GPU variety (4 vs 2 types)